Yeah, I hates those “eh†levels.Nimono wrote:Fun level reminiscent of the original Super Mario World. A little on the “eh†side, though, not much special about it
VLDC9 - vanilla level design contest 9
- Le Neveu de Rameau
- I'm a hoobsie roller; I got robots in my life
- Posts: 994
- Joined: 8 years ago
- First name: Rameau's Nephew
- Location: Gettin' gibbly with the business
Re: VLDC9 - valleys lugging desert caverns 9
- BobisOnlyBob
- Mythical Quadruped
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: the world is no longer a place
Re: VLDC9 - valleys lugging desert caverns 9
I got so confused by this and was like "when was a yellow yoshi in the level"Grounder wrote:rip jayscribble's avatar
somehow that rotation has landed like 98% of the time on the yellow yoshi avatar instead of the rex
I'm guessing that's meant to be '~eh' or '-eh' or something like that. †is ’ (not ' but ’, there is a difference!) when mangled through non-UTF8 character encoding. Not sure what the œ is misencoded from.Le Neveu de Rameau wrote:Yeah, I hates those “eh†levels.
Re: VLDC9 - valleys lugging desert caverns 9
Oh boy, we have Purple Plains except it's Yellow. >.>
I don't understand why Vanilla Secret 1.5 ranked as high as it did. I found it really boring. The first half was basically all lava raft rides where you basically had to do nothing but duck and jump once every ten minutes. And then it transitioned into a standard romp, which doesn't help it much. Once Koopster pointed out that it was a transition from the inner part of Vanilla Dome to the outer part I liked it a bit more, but it doesn't help too much.
I also don't understand why Aero Plains ranked so high. I'm not sure what it did differently from the romps in the 60s and 70s to warrant being 44th. Especially considering that it had weird design decisions like having to wait out the P-switch for no reason, and at least one part that looked like it was dragged wholesale out of Yoshi's Island 1.
Also, now it's really bothering me that I don't know what the red level is. I suppose I'll know it when I see it.
I don't understand why Vanilla Secret 1.5 ranked as high as it did. I found it really boring. The first half was basically all lava raft rides where you basically had to do nothing but duck and jump once every ten minutes. And then it transitioned into a standard romp, which doesn't help it much. Once Koopster pointed out that it was a transition from the inner part of Vanilla Dome to the outer part I liked it a bit more, but it doesn't help too much.
I also don't understand why Aero Plains ranked so high. I'm not sure what it did differently from the romps in the 60s and 70s to warrant being 44th. Especially considering that it had weird design decisions like having to wait out the P-switch for no reason, and at least one part that looked like it was dragged wholesale out of Yoshi's Island 1.
Also, now it's really bothering me that I don't know what the red level is. I suppose I'll know it when I see it.
- Ivy
- Posts: 2389
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Pronouns: any
- Contact:
- https://ivy.talkhaus.com/
Re: VLDC9 - valleys lugging desert caverns 9
I heard a lot of people say that it's long but not difficultraocow wrote:you guys where right about tomorrow's video being a one level deal, but the way y'all where speaking I was expecting some kind of hell monster, not something I had a blast with..!
3DS FC: 2793-0650-7690 | Switch: SW-2766-9108-9399 | Steam: ivysaur1996 (ivy)
- Stink Terios
- Posts: 577
- Joined: 12 years ago
Re: VLDC9 - valleys lugging desert caverns 9
Way to reference the wrong Touhou song!
Anyway, I didn't like this level at all. Gave me war flashbacks of Miscellaneous Monument.
Anyway, I didn't like this level at all. Gave me war flashbacks of Miscellaneous Monument.
- FrozenQuills
- hehe haha 2024
- Posts: 843
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: my skull
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
The thing about Starry Summit I think is that you either understand the quirks and hints that the level gives, you don't understand at all, or you misunderstand the hints entirely, which does happen. For example, Pyro didn't understand what the hint in the bullet-yoshi room meant at all at first. These issues, added onto the big risk of dying in the secret exit, contributed to some design problems with the judges.
There is also a lot to take in and observe, which doesn't go hand in hand with players that just want some athletic action.
Still, I have to say this is one of the most creative levels in the contest in terms of puzzles.
There is also a lot to take in and observe, which doesn't go hand in hand with players that just want some athletic action.
Still, I have to say this is one of the most creative levels in the contest in terms of puzzles.
avatar by crayonchewer!
- AUS
- Toni#4796
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Toni
- Pronouns: they/them/their
- Location: アース
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
Yeah I guess if you're bad then the level is hard.
"oh no my best friend was replaced by a evil demon shadow monster"
"argh i am the evil shadow monster demon shadow"
Vip is pronounced "Beep"
nostalgic realtime nitroid let's play playlist
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
And here they are.
50th: STARRY SUMMIT by Leiras
50th: STARRY SUMMIT by Leiras
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
I don't know man, if a puzzle level is "super clear" on "what needs to be done" it's not a very good puzzle level now is itinteresting concept but suffered heavily from not being super clear on what needed to be done
Not being clear about what you need to do is literally the point yo
ahh yes, the good ol' follow a star up a vertical level trope! It's a classic at this point tbh, very overdone. Can level designers please just stop using it already? Having to play this old gimmick in level after level is very tiresomeother than that, the level doesn't do anything new
...
these judge comments are confusing
the level would be a lot better if it had a one-up checkpoint for the secret exit. The guy even had the perfect setup for it with the one tile wide drop! I can't wait until that engine quirk is common knowledge and people start using it more often
this is getting laundromatic
- raocow
- the death of the incredible huge
- Posts: 4095
- Joined: 15 years ago
- Location: maybe the Wizards are the most complex, and the sales guys are up their daily
- https://raocow.talkhaus.com/
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
dude wrote on youtube that he didn't know about the 1up extra midpoint trick until after the deadline, so, yup.
and yeah, a lot of the judge comments for this level in particular leave me more puzzled than the actual level itself.
and yeah, a lot of the judge comments for this level in particular leave me more puzzled than the actual level itself.
the chillaxest of dragons
- BobisOnlyBob
- Mythical Quadruped
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: the world is no longer a place
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
The judge comments don't baffle me at all, it just shows that Koopster is the only judge who understands and appreciates puzzle levels that are actually well-constructed novel puzzles. Clarity was definitely not an issue with the huge HINT sections spelling out mechanics. The midpoint issue is definitely true though, the moment raocow entered the secret exit path my gut reaction was just "please savestate here", because there really needed to be a midpoint there.
- Mad Zookeeper
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 9 years ago
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
yea, i don't think i really agree with the judges comments outside of koopster on this one. as a puzzle level i think this was probably the best one that i've seen raocow play given that he didn't actually get frustrated with figuring any of the puzzles themselves out. that, to me, is a mark of a very well done puzzle level.
Just a guy in a place with a thing.
- TaviTurnip
- Reach for the top
- Abministrator
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Rena
- Location: Winter
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
You should be used to raocow enjoying perfectly good levels that other people get paranoid about for no reason by now.
I mean, beep boop [insert snarky text #37]
I mean, beep boop [insert snarky text #37]
I regularly stream on Twitch! with other members of the talkhaus. Come watch Monday, Tuesday and Friday at 2PM for blind playthroughs and Pokémon and Touhou and stuff. Come hang out with us!
- FrozenQuills
- hehe haha 2024
- Posts: 843
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: my skull
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
oh man opinions, they exist.
You can't really discount those who didn't like the level, really. I can imagine a world where raocow did not accidentally solve that second puzzle leaving people to criticize more of the level design (using knowledge of sprite spawns is some unintuitive design tbh), or raocow dying multiple times to the bullet part, or raocow not immediately getting the last puzzle of the secret exit.
For comparison, here's Pyro's experience of the level. It took her like 45 minutes, and it's drastically different from raocow's.
DarkMatt even thought this level should be in worst world.
You can't really discount those who didn't like the level, really. I can imagine a world where raocow did not accidentally solve that second puzzle leaving people to criticize more of the level design (using knowledge of sprite spawns is some unintuitive design tbh), or raocow dying multiple times to the bullet part, or raocow not immediately getting the last puzzle of the secret exit.
For comparison, here's Pyro's experience of the level. It took her like 45 minutes, and it's drastically different from raocow's.
DarkMatt even thought this level should be in worst world.
avatar by crayonchewer!
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
I'm not criticizing people who didn't like the level. I actually think it had a few problems, and to a certain extent I can even understand people who say "it wasn't clear enough". But come on, if you're going to be writing a judge comment, at least try to explain yourself and your rating.FrozenQuills wrote:oh man opinions, they exist.
You can't really discount those who didn't like the level, really. I can imagine a world where raocow did not accidentally solve that second puzzle leaving people to criticize more of the level design (using knowledge of sprite spawns is some unintuitive design tbh), or raocow dying multiple times to the bullet part, or raocow not immediately getting the last puzzle of the secret exit.
For comparison, here's Pyro's experience of the level. It took her like 45 minutes, and it's drastically different from raocow's.
Coming up with comments like "the level didn't do anything new" tells me that the judge didn't like the level but couldn't articulate why they didn't like it, so they just came up with something completely random and generic instead.
And I think I can legitimately criticize the judges for that. It's not a criticism of their opinion but rather of their justification of their opinion.
this is getting laundromatic
- FrozenQuills
- hehe haha 2024
- Posts: 843
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: my skull
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
My comment was directed at those who overly praised the level's design (and even thought it was flawless (cough cough youtube commentators)) when they only know the experience from raocow's perspective, but your point about judging levels is also very valid.Ryrir wrote: I'm not criticizing people who didn't like the level. I actually think it had a few problems, and to a certain extent I can even understand people who say "it wasn't clear enough". But come on, if you're going to be writing a judge comment, at least try to explain yourself and your rating.
Coming up with comments like "the level didn't do anything new" tells me that the judge didn't like the level but couldn't articulate why they didn't like it, so they just came up with something completely random and generic instead.
And I think I can legitimately criticize the judges for that. It's not a criticism of their opinion but rather of their justification of their opinion.
avatar by crayonchewer!
- nathanisbored
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 15 years ago
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
just chiming in to say (again) that the problem here isnt the judging, its the format of the contest and scoring criteria, and the fact that it doesnt account for the genre of level or intent by author, style, replayability, learning curve, etc. maybe one day people will decide that level design contests without either specifications for these things or adaptive criteria are a bad idea, and also the workload of 150+ levels for each judge to score is a horrendous idea. i could also mention that its not even vanilla because the baserom had several patches that change mechanics (most notably SA-1 which is a complete engine rewrite), but thats a whole other discussion. bottom line is dont take scoring/ranking seriously. it literally means nothing, and the community was obviously more concerned with making a functioning and impressive compilation hack than a well-balanced contest with interesting conditions. so take it for what it became.
i liked the puzzle level. i agree about the 1-up checkpoint thing :3
i liked the puzzle level. i agree about the 1-up checkpoint thing :3
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
That's a very fair point. I guess if you'd have to write an individual comment for over 100 levels while under relative time pressure, you can't expect to have individualized, meaningful comments for every entry.
I guess at that point it would be better to do without judge comments at all, instead of writing a comment for the sake of writing a comment.
I guess at that point it would be better to do without judge comments at all, instead of writing a comment for the sake of writing a comment.
this is getting laundromatic
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
Honestly, I really loved the level, too! I thought it had GREAT puzzles. The only thing I didn't like was how easy it was to screw up at the start of the secret exit path even if you manage to get the yoshi (I remember the level needing the baby to eat absolutely 0 bullet bills or you couldn't do it), and how if you happened to die, you had to redo the whole star babysitting. If the latter had been possible for the creator to deal with using the knowledge he had, it really would've been an absolutely amazing level. Maybe not top 5, but definitely amazing!Mad Zookeeper wrote:yea, i don't think i really agree with the judges comments outside of koopster on this one. as a puzzle level i think this was probably the best one that i've seen raocow play given that he didn't actually get frustrated with figuring any of the puzzles themselves out. that, to me, is a mark of a very well done puzzle level.
tbh i'm shocked I only gave it a 37, that's a score of "average" imo, but I definitely thought it was better than "average"... Not sure why I only gave it 11/20 in creativity, definitely more creative than that.
- nathanisbored
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 15 years ago
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
If the community actually trusted their judges to do their job in a meaningful way, then you wouldnt need 4 judges to score the same level. You could spread the workload between them. Ideally no judge would have more than 15 levels, because any more than that and you cant give meaningful attention to any one level specifically. With 150 levels you only have time to play the levels once, you dont even get to analyze them (and forget about accounting for replay value in your score). what if you have an off day and play really bad, or just dont notice certain things? what if youre in a bad mood? what if it's the first level youre scoring and you havent established a baseline yet? And what about hard/endurance levels? do you just write them off as bad because theyre a different genre than the average level? how do you even score them under the same criteria as other levels? same for puzzle levels, etc. The problem is the criteria is so vague and bad that the scores arent really quantifiable, but for some reason rather than fixing the rubric, they just hope the average scores even out to some meaningful number. this is a problem in every single smw level design contest, and it feels like im the only one seeing the problem (ive pointed it out before as well).Ryrir wrote:That's a very fair point. I guess if you'd have to write an individual comment for over 100 levels while under relative time pressure, you can't expect to have individualized, meaningful comments for every entry.
I guess at that point it would be better to do without judge comments at all, instead of writing a comment for the sake of writing a comment.
speaking of an off-day, sorry if i sound bitter, it's just tiresome to me.
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
Submitting a puzzle level to a contest strikes me as taking a huge risk to make, considering how many people just can't stand puzzle levels.
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
This is an absolutely atrocious idea which has been brought up several times before, and it would not work for a multitude of reasons:nathanisbored wrote:If the community actually trusted their judges to do their job in a meaningful way, then you wouldnt need 4 judges to score the same level
..
spread out the workload
a) You would need to be sure that the judges all understand the criteria which they are judging to perfection, regardless of what that criteria actually is.
b) You need to find a set of judges with the exact same philosophies on level design, otherwise you're going to end up with results that are no different than what we've seen in every other contest. Take today's level, for instance - if the levels are randomly distributed and this level ended up being judged by Koopster, it would have scored in the top 5-10. If it was scored by Eternity, it might have ranked near the bottom. The story would be quite a bit different based on which judge played what.
c) re: "what if you have an off day" - this is why ninja boy was an example of a bad judge. As previously mentioned, he graded very harshly at first, and then with more lenience later on without actually going back and correcting his previous entries. When you change your standards wildly mid-ranking, then yes, the problem is the judge and not the criteria. Someone actually took out ninja boy's scores entirely and showed what the order would be without them, and the results were pretty different, yet the top 10 was quite a bit more acceptable overall.
d) This also assumes that you know who will be a good judge prior to bringing them on. In the VLDC's case, this has been going on for a decade - obviously, the same people who judged the first are very likely gone by the ninth, so new judges need to be continuously be brought in. Someone can be a good level designer, have a good grasp of what makes a level fun (in general), but still be a pretty terrible judge - that's a bit of a risk you have to take. This isn't just an SMW level contest issue either - it has happened with every SMBX contest, and likely other contests all around the Internet.
You can't quantify subjectivity - you're correct about that - but there still has to be at least somewhat general guidelines to work with. That being said, the spreading-out-the-workload method would lead to far, far more skewed results, and there is a reason this has been shot down multiple times.
- Le Neveu de Rameau
- I'm a hoobsie roller; I got robots in my life
- Posts: 994
- Joined: 8 years ago
- First name: Rameau's Nephew
- Location: Gettin' gibbly with the business
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
Pish-posh, all you need to do is run your dowsing rod over each entry; thus will you detect the cut of their inner jib.
- BobisOnlyBob
- Mythical Quadruped
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: the world is no longer a place
Re: VLDC9 - ventures livening dusky canyons 9
I know raocow and others have you pegged as the high-scoring judge, but to me this kinda sums you up - the amnesiac judge! Your scores actually come out sensibly for me, but the fact that they often seem to not line up with your comments or your current opinions is a bit mysterious! Not that I'm implying shenanigans or disapproving, just that your judgement is a little baffling - but at least it's not the outright wackiness of ninja boy's.Nimono wrote:tbh i'm shocked I only gave it a 37, that's a score of "average" imo, but I definitely thought it was better than "average"... Not sure why I only gave it 11/20 in creativity, definitely more creative than that.