Definitely but I don't see how it's a valid comparison here is all.Rockythechao wrote:To be fair, American politics are all sorts of messed up and electoral fraud is sorta kinda a problem here in the states.
She's only going over things manually to make sure it works. So if it does then realistically next year she wouldn't be going over things. And it's probably going to be quicker with the bot anyways. If it logs the votes to a file then the only reason to load a thread is just to make sure it's not taking someone's post as a vote after their actual vote post. After that it's just checking the results the bot gives her. And it's a lot easier to check the top result there rather than going over every result for a given category and making sure there are no erroneous votes.Doctor Shemp wrote:I'm just saying I think it would take less time to count them manually than to construct a bot and then end up counting them manually anyway when something breaks or it's very close and someone forgot a space or whatever. Besides, having just counted them manually -KobaBeach 9 (+1 incorrectly formatted vote that a bot would ignore); Doctor Shemp 5; Slit08 1; abstention 1
- it took less than a minute.