Page 3 of 3
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 29 Apr 2011, 18:19
by peteyboo
Oh wow. You uploaded like 1500 videos in the span of a few hours. <_<;
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 29 Apr 2011, 22:29
by Sebby19
hooray!
Let's back them all up just to be sure!
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 01:21
by Dollop of Mayo
peteyboo wrote:Oh wow. You uploaded like 1500 videos in the span of a few hours. <_<;
The videos were just made private so they were never deleted in the first place. They were just hiding, waiting for their chance to strike.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 05:04
by Sebby19
Unfortunetly now they all have ads about Vin Diesal, some cartoon, or Jack Layton.
Off topic: So raocow, are you gonna vote? This will be my first federal election.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 08:04
by peteyboo
DancingMad wrote:peteyboo wrote:Oh wow. You uploaded like 1500 videos in the span of a few hours. <_<;
The videos were just made private so they were never deleted in the first place. They were just hiding, waiting for their chance to strike.
Nah man, he totally uploaded at a rate of one video every 10 seconds.
Although these videos are awfully similar to the ones I watched for a couple months before joinging this forum...
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 11:17
by kilon
Sebby19 wrote:Unfortunetly now they all have ads about Vin Diesal, some cartoon, or Jack Layton.
Adblock Plus.
I don't care this leads to less income for the youtube user (in this case raocow). They just shouldn't have ads.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 14:59
by BeatBoxingBoo
I personally don't care about ads. They're not very long and it gives money to the the youtuber I'm watching.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 15:04
by Argumentable
kilon wrote:
Adblock Plus.
I don't care this leads to less income for the youtube user (in this case raocow). They just shouldn't have ads.
I can't be sure since you have a billion posts to sift through, but haven't you said the exact opposite at one point?
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 15:05
by Cobalt
BeatBoxingBoo wrote:I personally don't care about ads. They're not very long and it gives money to the the youtuber I'm watching.
ads are good they give money
they're like bitcoins except better and only for raocow in this case
(ps i don't like bitcoins i've been mining for three days and all i have is one penny)
I wish i had a place with ads so people could look at them and i can get money and buy minecraft accounts for people!!!
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 15:15
by kilon
Argumentable wrote:kilon wrote:
Adblock Plus.
I don't care this leads to less income for the youtube user (in this case raocow). They just shouldn't have ads.
I can't be sure since you have a billion posts to sift through, but haven't you said the exact opposite at one point?
Did I? I have no idea.
Either way, my current opinion is that I don't like ads.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 19:32
by yoshicookiezeus
Ohey the videos are back. I guess this means I can finally continue playing along with your old Super Marisa World LP :D
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 19:43
by megamario
yoshicookiezeus wrote:Ohey the videos are back. I guess this means I can finally continue playing along with your old Super Marisa World LP :D
And then follow it up with raocow's descent into hatred & depression that was MariAri
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 19:49
by yoshicookiezeus
As a matter of fact, I have been playing MariAri a bit lately as well, and I can definitely testament to world 8 being as hard as it looked in raocow's videos; only managed to clear three of the stages in it so far. I think it helps somewhat that I don't have to make videos of it every day, though.
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 20:44
by morsel/morceau
Argumentable wrote:kilon wrote:
Adblock Plus.
I don't care this leads to less income for the youtube user (in this case raocow). They just shouldn't have ads.
I can't be sure since you have a billion posts to sift through, but haven't you said the exact opposite at one point?
I remember the
great ad debate of '09.
kilon wrote:So I'm the only one who doesn't mind about the ads then?
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 01 May 2011, 06:56
by kilon
morsel/morceau wrote:Argumentable wrote:kilon wrote:
Adblock Plus.
I don't care this leads to less income for the youtube user (in this case raocow). They just shouldn't have ads.
I can't be sure since you have a billion posts to sift through, but haven't you said the exact opposite at one point?
I remember the
great ad debate of '09.
kilon wrote:So I'm the only one who doesn't mind about the ads then?
Heh..
I miss the first year of this forum
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 02 May 2011, 14:17
by Dollop of Mayo
To me, ads are fine until they become obnoxious, which ads have become due to people blocking them anyway. When the ad distracts me from the content it is advertised upon, it is time for teh Adblox
Re: the privatisation situation
Posted: 02 May 2011, 15:57
by Mandew
I don't mind ads until they declare personal war upon me (read: when they download a virus on my computer).