WHICH IS WHY IT SHOULD HAPPEN ;DPink wrote:I dunno about that option... Letting the viewers vote would usually lead to the hardest, most frustrating route being chosen.
idk, they all look hard to me actually.
WHICH IS WHY IT SHOULD HAPPEN ;DPink wrote:I dunno about that option... Letting the viewers vote would usually lead to the hardest, most frustrating route being chosen.
DancingMad wrote:Okay so I've got this idea for a hack
50 stages
Wind of intermittent strength in all stages
Ceiling no higher than about 3 blocks at any point
"Mid"points 75% through the stages
All bosses are invisible
Or did I just come up with Vip6?
raocow wrote:Next LP project - the entire hunter/scorpion series in chronological order
..Not really, the scales have already been made and it's called kaizo.Duker wrote:It's on a whole new scale of implausibility for a non-cheating human to complete.
I was asking which was harder.PitaPatPaxton wrote:I really enjoy these castles. And I didn't like Vip1 so I'd say this castle is better. Btw, door 1 today was AWESOME!
Oh, sorry. By the looks of it I'd say Hyper V over Vip1 but I'm saying that without actually playing it.PitaPatPaxton wrote:
I really enjoy these castles. And I didn't like Vip1 so I'd say this castle is better. Btw, door 1 today was AWESOME!
Ashanmaril wrote:
I was asking which was harder.
That's the same reason that raocow already said "stuff it" to when people tell him to use savestates.anomaly wrote:Yeah, the "I'll do a legit run through one path" plan... I think you should just forget about it. It's not fun for the player, or for the viewers.
Just complete each layer, and the castle, and move on.
Then you don't realize the difference between checkpoints and cheesing.AUS wrote:That's the same reason that raocow already said "stuff it" to when people tell him to use savestates.anomaly wrote:Yeah, the "I'll do a legit run through one path" plan... I think you should just forget about it. It's not fun for the player, or for the viewers.
Just complete each layer, and the castle, and move on.
How so?anomaly wrote:That's like saying this thread should not exist.