(shouting)

S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

this is the place where lps are being talked about. it's important to talk about games being played on the internet.
User avatar
Sebby19
Posts: 2544
Joined: 14 years ago
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Sebby19 »

The four bosses are the 4 main characters, in their 'godtier' outfits: John, Rose, Dave, and Jane (who is also part omniscient dog). The John sprite looks a bit like too zombie-ish, though.
ImageImage
-Banned in Antarctica
Sebby19 wrote:If your life depends on throwing up, switch to the keyboard
Official raocow subscriber # 30,000
User avatar
Unaniem
Desperately trying to figure out just what the hell
Posts: 178
Joined: 11 years ago
First name: Tree
Location: Megalovanilla

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Unaniem »

I don't know whether to bash the boss design here or compliment it.

On one hand it's really lazy to just use the same boss five times (Kirby included), but on the other hand it's interesting to see the exact same boss made harder using only environment changes, and doing them in a row only accentuates that.

Eh.
Image
User avatar
Mata Hari
Posts: 2523
Joined: 14 years ago
https://matahari.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mata Hari »

I'm not super enamoured with the idea of using the same glitchy boss frice in a row, which is like thrice only there are four of them.
User avatar
oobitydoo
Posts: 14
Joined: 10 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by oobitydoo »

Unaniem wrote:I don't know whether to bash the boss design here or compliment it.

On one hand it's really lazy to just use the same boss five times (Kirby included), but on the other hand it's interesting to see the exact same boss made harder using only environment changes, and doing them in a row only accentuates that.

Eh.
I see it kind of like Reznor, who's always the same, or maybe more appropriately like Dunce in MGU since they're at least variants on a theme. They could probably stand to take a few fewer hits, though maybe hackmaker did that since their invincibility frames didn't stick? ¯\(ツ)/¯
Sebby19 wrote:It's called Showtime (Original Mix)
I liked this setting of Showtime in the Mario engine. It is too bad he didn't use each HS character's respective combat music for their fights. I would've loved to hear Dissension that way.
User avatar
Mata Hari
Posts: 2523
Joined: 14 years ago
https://matahari.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mata Hari »

Also I'm a little confused why the dude decided to give Abra a grey ring-shaped booster seat rather than using one of its evolutions which would be the correct height in the first place.
User avatar
Alice
Posts: 2367
Joined: 12 years ago
Pronouns: Girl person
Location: Wonderland

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Alice »

The overall design of today's levels seems rather questionable to me. Four levels of reasonably increasing difficulty with the more difficult part of the level being after the midpoint then ending with a progressively harder and harder boss that has some glitchy hit detection and takes significantly more than the standard three hits. At the very least the mid points should have been in different locations, if not multiple midpoints instead.
User avatar
Mineyl
Posts: 95
Joined: 13 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mineyl »

Wow, those Swinub aren't as artistically sound as most of the rest of the Pokemon sprites...and were the Spike Top replacements Shellos with spikes on their heads? I can't really make them out.

Today's references were more tasteful, but I'm still pretty well against direct reference injection like that. Can't please everyone, though, right?
Menshay wrote:What's the Wind and Shade music from, by the way?
The song is Underwater City from Rudra no Hihou / Treasure of the Rudras.
raocow wrote:I don't know what it means, but you're screaming at me and I'm used to that.
User avatar
Yikes
Posts: 7
Joined: 14 years ago
Location: Germany

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Yikes »

Unaniem wrote:I don't know whether to bash the boss design here or compliment it.

On one hand it's really lazy to just use the same boss five times (Kirby included), but on the other hand it's interesting to see the exact same boss made harder using only environment changes, and doing them in a row only accentuates that.
Imo it would have been better to recycle the 4 castle bosses in different environments instead of just recycle Kirby four times.
Alice wrote:The overall design of today's levels seems rather questionable to me. Four levels of reasonably increasing difficulty with the more difficult part of the level being after the midpoint then ending with a progressively harder and harder boss that has some glitchy hit detection and takes significantly more than the standard three hits. At the very least the mid points should have been in different locations, if not multiple midpoints instead.
This. Even though, the 3rd boss was probably the most annoying, it would have been better with shorter levels (specially stage 4) or a second midpoint. The length of the first level was optimal.
Gesundheit!
User avatar
Menshay
Posts: 2
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Italy

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Menshay »

Mineyl wrote:and were the Spike Top replacements Shellos with spikes on their heads?
Shiny Trapinches with spikes on top, I guess.
skyluigi2
Posts: 1
Joined: 10 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by skyluigi2 »

Well, okay then. The levels themselves today weren't too horrible (not as much as the third Star World anyway), but using the same boss battle repeatedly? And it wasn't that good to start with, especially being kind of glitchy. Still, it's out of the way now, let's just hope we won't see the same boss a sixth time.
Septentrion Pleiades
Banned
Posts: 0
Joined: 13 years ago
First name: Stephen
Location: Holstaurus Heaven

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Septentrion Pleiades »

I'm not sure what problem everyone has with the bosses. It's a platforming enemy vs a platforming player. The whole "glitch" thing is a common knowledge in SMW that is easy to avoid, even in a battle situation. You'll be very hard pressed to find SMW bosses as easy and fun as them.
I remember three main boss types in this game. The "kirby" the "pidgeot." and "bloistoise."
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Alice
Posts: 2367
Joined: 12 years ago
Pronouns: Girl person
Location: Wonderland

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Alice »

Septentrion Pleiades wrote:I'm not sure what problem everyone has with the bosses. It's a platforming enemy vs a platforming player. The whole "glitch" thing is a common knowledge in SMW that is easy to avoid, even in a battle situation. You'll be very hard pressed to find SMW bosses as easy and fun as them.
I remember three main boss types in this game. The "kirby" the "pidgeot." and "bloistoise."
The location of the bosses after a full half a level combined with being glitchy (which is apparently not as easy to avoid as you think) and taking six or seven hits to kill is the problem. There's a reason why the original SMW levels typically have the midway point right before the boss or before a reasonably short area and they only take three hits. The only one of those bosses where six or seven hits could possibly be excused is the last one but even there it'd be pushing being tedious. And that's only counting the boss in that instance, not the fairly difficult stretch of level between the midpoint and the boss.
Septentrion Pleiades
Banned
Posts: 0
Joined: 13 years ago
First name: Stephen
Location: Holstaurus Heaven

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Septentrion Pleiades »

Alice wrote:
Septentrion Pleiades wrote:I'm not sure what problem everyone has with the bosses. It's a platforming enemy vs a platforming player. The whole "glitch" thing is a common knowledge in SMW that is easy to avoid, even in a battle situation. You'll be very hard pressed to find SMW bosses as easy and fun as them.
I remember three main boss types in this game. The "kirby" the "pidgeot." and "bloistoise."
The location of the bosses after a full half a level combined with being glitchy (which is apparently not as easy to avoid as you think) and taking six or seven hits to kill is the problem. There's a reason why the original SMW levels typically have the midway point right before the boss or before a reasonably short area and they only take three hits. The only one of those bosses where six or seven hits could possibly be excused is the last one but even there it'd be pushing being tedious. And that's only counting the boss in that instance, not the fairly difficult stretch of level between the midpoint and the boss.
You do know I've played this? The bosses aren't that hard.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Mata Hari
Posts: 2523
Joined: 14 years ago
https://matahari.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mata Hari »

Septentrion Pleiades wrote:The whole "glitch" thing is a common knowledge in SMW that is easy to avoid, even in a battle situation.
Misbehaving custom elements shouldn't even be used. It's one thing to have a glitch that doesn't ever come up, and another to have a glitch that the player has to continuously act to avoid.

Even then it wouldn't have been so bad had it not come up frice.
User avatar
Alice
Posts: 2367
Joined: 12 years ago
Pronouns: Girl person
Location: Wonderland

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Alice »

Septentrion Pleiades wrote:You do know I've played this? The bosses aren't that hard.
And everyone is identical to you?
User avatar
Minnakht
Green eyed monster
Posts: 167
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Poland

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Minnakht »

Misbehaving custom elements shouldn't even be used. It's one thing to have a glitch that doesn't ever come up, and another to have a glitch that the player has to continuously act to avoid.
I'm probably running some fallacious argument here, but it's funny and I just want to say it before Shemp or someone else does.

Let's not ever have more than one enemy sprite on the screen, or else you can glitch-get-hurt when you jump on both of them at once.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CodeGorilla
Posts: 90
Joined: 11 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by CodeGorilla »

dr_kraid wrote:
Septentrion Pleiades wrote:The whole "glitch" thing is a common knowledge in SMW that is easy to avoid, even in a battle situation.
Misbehaving custom elements shouldn't even be used. It's one thing to have a glitch that doesn't ever come up, and another to have a glitch that the player has to continuously act to avoid.

Even then it wouldn't have been so bad had it not come up frice.
Yeah, you should never use Thwimps in your hack because of this glitchy behavior.
User avatar
Mata Hari
Posts: 2523
Joined: 14 years ago
https://matahari.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mata Hari »

But is it something you have to actively keep in mind when playing around Thwimps?
User avatar
Minnakht
Green eyed monster
Posts: 167
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Poland

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Minnakht »

Yes. And Eeries. Try to ferry yourself across a gap by spinjumping on two stacked Eerie sprites and chances are you'll glitch and be hurt. Or jump down on two Dry Bones at once. Happened in Swirlybomb's MAGL level, I think.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Mata Hari
Posts: 2523
Joined: 14 years ago
https://matahari.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mata Hari »

I just don't think you should be putting stuff in your level that would encourage that glitch to occur. In all honestly I dunno about the Thwimps but I've never seen them act up to the extent those custom bosses were. Especially since you (spin)jump on them once or not at all, while you jump on the bosses multiple times.

I know I've said this but the fact there were four of those bosses in a row would have also meant the glitch came up way more than it would have for a single iteration.
User avatar
ano0maly
Discord User
Posts: 2947
Joined: 12 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by ano0maly »

You would think that someone in the SMW hacking community would have made a generally applicable patch to fix these.
User avatar
Leet
Well, hello, Smith ( ´-`)ノ
Posts: 3025
Joined: 11 years ago
First name: Chie Arale
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Harman's Room
https://leet.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Leet »

find it funny how raocow called Dave "Johnny boy" in the lil cal level and here he mentioned Ironicus when entering John's room

edit: "lad jump" are you kidding meeee

anyway that Jade fight was actually really cool with how it took advantage of the boss sprite to make a significantly different battle (which also fits with Jade's tradition in-comic of subverting established patterns) they just should remove the player gates to make it less "bluh"
Last edited by Leet 10 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
Well it is a decent hack but sometime its just too repetitif there no level that actually pop in your face and your like oh yeah that level they all ressemble themselves and just monster along the way.
Blood Ghoul wrote:Sometimes it seems my blood spurts out in gobs, as if it were a fountain's pulsing sobs. I clearly hear it mutter as it goes yet cannot find the wound from which it flows. Before I met you, baby, I didn't know what I was missing.
User avatar
CodeGorilla
Posts: 90
Joined: 11 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by CodeGorilla »

The problem with Thwimps can crop up anywhere you have Thwimps, and is the same problem here: if you try to bounce on an enemy that's moving upward fast enough (i.e. faster than Mario), you bounce, but you also get hit. Don't know enough about patching to know what you could do about it.

EDIT: One thing that could've been done with this boss is to make it drop to the ground when it's hit. That, after all, is why green parakoopas don't have this issue.
User avatar
Mineyl
Posts: 95
Joined: 13 years ago

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Mineyl »

All I'll say about the glitchy jumping is that, unlike Thwimps, you are actually required to stomp on these bosses. Thwimps, for all intents and purposes, are designed to be dodged, and if it weren't for the spin jump, there'd be no conceivable way to touch them under everyday conditions. The oversight on the bosses should be corrected or they shouldn't be used at all.
raocow wrote:I don't know what it means, but you're screaming at me and I'm used to that.
User avatar
Lejes
Posts: 78
Joined: 10 years ago
https://lejes.talkhaus.com/

Re: S.P.L.U.C.E. - What's that random reference?!

Post by Lejes »

Septentrion Pleiades wrote: You do know I've played this? The bosses aren't that hard.
I've played it too! And the bosses are pretty bad. It's a common theme in SMW hacking. Instead of designing around or fixing some problem inherent to the SMW engine, hackers accentuate it as much as possible, as if they're trying to sour you on the entire concept of platformers. But man, if you think these plodding walk-back-and-forth-matons were bad, just wait until you see the big kahuna of this hack's bosses.

GET HYPE
Post Reply