Code: Select all
Vote: Holy
Code: Select all
Vote: No Lynch
I'm not advocating a random lynch. I'm advocating a lynch of someone who is suspicious.8flight wrote: ↑6 years agoPeople who try to lynch at random are usually mafia, and considering that voltglass has played the game before, I doubt that he's a townie pushing for a lynch and considering how he's been urging us to vote and has voted 2 different people I vote
Code: Select all
Voltglass
I am being pushy, because town is sitting around doing nothing otherwise. We're down a power role out of the gate. We need to act.pholtos wrote: flighty is right, volt. You're being oddly pushy. But at the same time you do have some correct points, and also the fact that Holy hasn't posted really is a tad odd.
It's also true what igno said, that if we random lynch we're in danger of simply weakening ourselves, especially after losing a power role.
Just to be clear, we need a proper majority to lynch, correct? As in five of the nine of us need to agree?
I would type a lot more, but you've just shown me that you wouldn't read it. Like, seriously. Go back and read the part where I say both (worst case) scenarios lead to us losing on day three (even if one technically plays out longer) and then tell me again that I said we'd lose on day four.bbbrrr_it_cold wrote: ↑6 years ago However, we'd basically lose Day 3 because we'd end up with 5 remaining after that lynch and thus 4 people on Day 4 and, as such, a majority couldn't possibly lynch a mafia. This is assuming we lynch incorrectly each time (and also assuming we lynch day 2 and 3). I suppose it is also assuming my math is right.
So, no, we don't need to lynch today. We're down a power role, sure, but this discussion by itself is giving us plenty of reasons to be suspicious of each other (wow, that's a terrible thing to say). If we lynch badly, we're one step closer to losing. If we lynch tomorrow, we'll have more info and hopefully avoid lynching incorrectly.
On the other hand, not lynching today doesn't actually slow down the mafia unless we assure that we lynch correctly at least once (or don't lynch tomorrow as well).
Code: Select all
Vote: Voltgloss
absolutely no one is suspicious at the moment.
honestly a fair point, but if we're going to lynch at basically complete random I'm going to indulge my own suspicions for the time being and not just join the bandwagon.Voltgloss wrote: ↑6 years ago Even if a lynch hits town - which hopefully it won't, but obviously it can - that gives us information next day we can use to try to find mafia. Who voted for the lynch. Who didn't. What was the timing of the votes. What did people say about the vote options. What didn't they say.
If the town does not lynch, how do you propose we find mafia? Sit around and twiddle our thumbs hoping a cop or tracker hits the jackpot? That's statistically LESS likely to find mafia then is lynching.
Code: Select all
Lynch pholtos
I apologize for missing this. I did so because I was focused on this:bbbrrr_it_cold wrote: ↑6 years ago However, we'd basically lose Day 3 because we'd end up with 5 remaining after that lynch and thus 4 people on Day 4 and, as such, a majority couldn't possibly lynch a mafia. This is assuming we lynch incorrectly each time (and also assuming we lynch day 2 and 3). I suppose it is also assuming my math is right.
and because I was also focused on these two conclusions:bbbrrr_it_cold wrote: ↑6 years agoFor what it's worth, let's look at the worst case scenario:
If we lynch incorrectly until we lose, that puts us at losing at Day 3.
TS|TV|TV|TV|TV|TV|TV|TS|MS|MG
N1|D1|N2|D2|N3|D3|N4
If we don't lynch today but still lynch incorrectly Day 2 and Day 3...we'd lose Day 4.
TS|TV|TV|TV|TV|TV|TV|TS|MS|MG
N1|N2|D2|N3|D3|N4|D4
No-lynching is just as bad as a mislynch. Worse, in the lack of data and the fact that a lynch might actually hit mafia. A no-lynch today is guaranteed to bring us "one step closer to losing."
Code: Select all
No lynch
(especially since I was wrong and sort of thought as such at the time)
, I might be a bit too worried about mis-lynching.Mind my asking your reasoning? Because I was just going back to the day 0 votes and his being the singular vote for Watcher did stick out a bit oddly to me, but it actually made me less suspicious of him after I thought about it for a bit. But if there's reason (especially if I'm missing something), I am all ears.Ignoritus wrote: ↑6 years ago but if we're going to lynch at basically complete random I'm going to indulge my own suspicions for the time being and not just join the bandwagon.
(super open to change as the day progresses)Code: Select all
Lynch pholtos
Sorry about this, those are rules I pasted from another site and read over, I guess I missed that part.bbbrrr_it_cold wrote: ↑6 years ago From the initial (sign-up) thread:Just to be clear, we need a proper majority to lynch, correct?
Code: Select all
Supershroom
I'm naturally open to changing my vote.Supershroom wrote:
So not a majority. Just whoever has the most votes, period? I just want to make absolutely sure that we have this clear, since it affects quite a few things, such as the sheer amount of votes needed to lynch, especially if we split votes a bunch.
Code: Select all
No Lynch
Yes. If there is one vote for someone, and two votes for no-lynch, then there will be no-lynch.
Supershroom wrote:Still waiting to hear from you again.
Code: Select all
vote Sturg