The Haus of Talk Thread
-
- Skeleton
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Newsome
- Location: The catacombs
- Contact:
Re: ./twitter-thread
my mom made this amazing dish with chicken, mushrooms, cream of mushroom soup, garlic, wheat noodles, and spinach
That crazy voice dude
- pholtos
- Loves adorable things.
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: 14 years ago
- Location: One of the States in the Center of the U.S.
Re: ./twitter-thread
Oh was there still an argument? I couldn't tell to be honest.
Host and Organizer of the Rando Pokemon Tournaments. Completed: I, II, III, IV, V
Dealer of the Pokermon Discord Tourneys.
I do LPs, check them out if you'd like.
Currently playing:
The 500 char limit is evil. :P
Dealer of the Pokermon Discord Tourneys.
I do LPs, check them out if you'd like.
Currently playing:
The 500 char limit is evil. :P
- cats-on-ice
- Back from the grave
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Lunikyuu
- I forgot what I was going to put here after MaGL X3
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Location: soup
Re: ./twitter-thread
I hope it's over.
e: also, in response to the perfect job question: game designer or space explorer (I'm talking uncharted solar systems and galaxies here)
After all, you can't really top a black hole.
e: also, in response to the perfect job question: game designer or space explorer (I'm talking uncharted solar systems and galaxies here)
- Maiku Wotaharu
- Karaoke Enthusiast and Honorary Armless Bipedal Cycloptic Demon
- Posts: 434
- Joined: 11 years ago
- First name: You'll figure it out.
- Location: Sharing a bunk bed with Pily
Re: ./twitter-thread
Damn it, you made my stomach growl!InsaneIntentions1 wrote:my mom made this amazing dish with chicken, mushrooms, cream of mushroom soup, garlic, wheat noodles, and spinach
The best part of waking up is...knowing where you are.
FINALLY, SOME MOSTS USERBARS!
FINALLY, SOME MOSTS USERBARS!
- BeatBoxingBoo
- Charlesbag
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: beatboxingboo
Re: ./twitter-thread
can i have like a recipeInsaneIntentions1 wrote:my mom made this amazing dish with chicken, mushrooms, cream of mushroom soup, garlic, wheat noodles, and spinach
-
- Skeleton
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Newsome
- Location: The catacombs
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 13 years ago
- Location: When you sleep there's a lesson you must learn: not for the lesson today, mate.
Re: ./twitter-thread
why would that be sarcasm?InsaneIntentions1 wrote:Can't tell if that's sarcasm
Check out my TF2 community workshop stuff:BeatBoxingBoo wrote:a medley is just, like, a mixture of medics
Crust Crusher Crafty Cutter PinheadThread
If I didn't like anybody who had a different opinion than me on something I like I wouldn't have any friends.-Bwarch
- BeatBoxingBoo
- Charlesbag
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: beatboxingboo
-
- Skeleton
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Newsome
- Location: The catacombs
- Contact:
Re: ./twitter-thread
You'll need fresh chopped garlic, fresh sliced mushrooms, fresh chopped basil, a bag of spinach, 1/2 packet of lipton onion soup, large can of campbells mushroom soup, moore's hickory marinade sauce, thin spaghetti noodles, chicken strips, olive oil, and chicken broth. First use a medium sauce pan add olive oil, garlic, mushrooms cook on medium for about a minute, add hickory sauce, lipton onion soup, and spinach cook until spinach and mushrooms are done. Season chicken and cook on grill, cook thin spaghetti noodles, shred chicken add cream of mushroom soup to cooked noodles, add garlic mushroom mixture, add 3/4 cup of chicken broth, pepper jack cheese, parmesan cheese, and mix it all together.
That crazy voice dude
- cats-on-ice
- Back from the grave
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 9 years ago
-
- Skeleton
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 14 years ago
- First name: Newsome
- Location: The catacombs
- Contact:
- Whimsical Calamari
- i am the one that sings the chorus when you hum in the shower
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Location: IT CAME FROM OVER THERE
-
- Banned
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: ./twitter-thread
Can't have been that much fun for the teacher.Fluffi-dono wrote:Today I had to do an oral exam. And guess what. I was done with every task after mere 50 seconds. My teacher said no one was as fast as that ever since she works as a teacher. And she is like 50 or so.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: ./twitter-thread
Oh, and for what it's worth on an old topic, Operation Lollipop is fairly new, and Tumblr was shit before then.
I'm no conservative. I'm against conservatism and especially reactionism as a principle. By the way, I'm using these terms and later ones in their actual meaning, not whatever American domestic politics has distorted them to mean, since I can't be buggered keeping up with that. I'm sure if you asked all the people on Tumblr who get hyper-offended about things their political opinion, they would say they're progressive, or liberal, which apparently in America means progressive for some reason despite the fact that we have liberal institutions and so it's completely possible to be a liberal conservative, but whatever. I mean, how could you be for gay and/or trans rights and not be progressive, unless you live somewhere where their equality is already enshrined in institutions, assuming there is one?
Yet progressivism as an ideology advocates change and abandonment of the present and the past, whether gradual or sudden. Change will always hurt some people. The ideology rests on the assumption that the betterment of the many is worth the hurt to the few, and on the belief that the status quo should never be immune to challenge. How is a position that no-one should ever be offended under any circumstances in any way consistent with a progressivist position? I can understand the argument that you shouldn't offend someone with their hurt as your sole intention, but I cannot reconcile progressivism with the belief that incidental offense should be avoided even if it means compromising or abandoning a reasoned argument, entire discussion, or scientific fact, nor can I understand how anyone can. What's the difference between a scientific fact that offends a right-winger with a scientific fact that offends a left-winger, other than the latter would get you shit on Tumblr?
From what I can see, Tumblr used a groundswell of internet progressivism to create a virtual progressivist state and, once doing so, promptly became extremely reactionary in their conservatism to protect said state's ideological position. This is common among progressivist groups: you can see it in socialist and communist groups worldwide, and it always ends the same way, just as Tumblr has: in endless infighting and purging to drive those with "impure ideologies" out, as the least progressive become the new enemy until eventually there's no-one left in the group.
Now, if Tumblr didn't become insular, reactionary, and obsessed with ideological purity, maybe they wouldn't receive widespread mockery, maybe they'd actually achieve something (to the limited extent internet activism can achieve anything, which is to say, to virtually no extent at all: how'd those meme posters against Mubarak turn out?), and they certainly wouldn't be vulnerable to conservative subversion like Operation Lollipop. Lollipop isn't unique anyway, and the tactic isn't unique to conservatives: conservative groups, especially reactionary ones, are just as vulnerable to becoming insular and obsessed with purity, and those that do can and have been subverted by progressivist groups before. To bring up 4chan's /pol/, which started Operation Lollipop, do you really think all the hyper-racists on there genuinely believe that? I'm sure most do, but some are progressives pretending to believe that and deliberately sounding stupid in the process. How else would progressives know about Operation Lollipop in the first place if not for subversives on the inside? I forget who said that the best way to attack someone's position is to defend it with deliberately flimsy arguments, but they were definitely right.
tl;dr Tumblr is shit.
I'm no conservative. I'm against conservatism and especially reactionism as a principle. By the way, I'm using these terms and later ones in their actual meaning, not whatever American domestic politics has distorted them to mean, since I can't be buggered keeping up with that. I'm sure if you asked all the people on Tumblr who get hyper-offended about things their political opinion, they would say they're progressive, or liberal, which apparently in America means progressive for some reason despite the fact that we have liberal institutions and so it's completely possible to be a liberal conservative, but whatever. I mean, how could you be for gay and/or trans rights and not be progressive, unless you live somewhere where their equality is already enshrined in institutions, assuming there is one?
Yet progressivism as an ideology advocates change and abandonment of the present and the past, whether gradual or sudden. Change will always hurt some people. The ideology rests on the assumption that the betterment of the many is worth the hurt to the few, and on the belief that the status quo should never be immune to challenge. How is a position that no-one should ever be offended under any circumstances in any way consistent with a progressivist position? I can understand the argument that you shouldn't offend someone with their hurt as your sole intention, but I cannot reconcile progressivism with the belief that incidental offense should be avoided even if it means compromising or abandoning a reasoned argument, entire discussion, or scientific fact, nor can I understand how anyone can. What's the difference between a scientific fact that offends a right-winger with a scientific fact that offends a left-winger, other than the latter would get you shit on Tumblr?
From what I can see, Tumblr used a groundswell of internet progressivism to create a virtual progressivist state and, once doing so, promptly became extremely reactionary in their conservatism to protect said state's ideological position. This is common among progressivist groups: you can see it in socialist and communist groups worldwide, and it always ends the same way, just as Tumblr has: in endless infighting and purging to drive those with "impure ideologies" out, as the least progressive become the new enemy until eventually there's no-one left in the group.
Now, if Tumblr didn't become insular, reactionary, and obsessed with ideological purity, maybe they wouldn't receive widespread mockery, maybe they'd actually achieve something (to the limited extent internet activism can achieve anything, which is to say, to virtually no extent at all: how'd those meme posters against Mubarak turn out?), and they certainly wouldn't be vulnerable to conservative subversion like Operation Lollipop. Lollipop isn't unique anyway, and the tactic isn't unique to conservatives: conservative groups, especially reactionary ones, are just as vulnerable to becoming insular and obsessed with purity, and those that do can and have been subverted by progressivist groups before. To bring up 4chan's /pol/, which started Operation Lollipop, do you really think all the hyper-racists on there genuinely believe that? I'm sure most do, but some are progressives pretending to believe that and deliberately sounding stupid in the process. How else would progressives know about Operation Lollipop in the first place if not for subversives on the inside? I forget who said that the best way to attack someone's position is to defend it with deliberately flimsy arguments, but they were definitely right.
tl;dr Tumblr is shit.
Re: ./twitter-thread
Thanks for putting this into actually thought-out, reasonable sentences. It's kinda hard to formulate complicated stuff like this in "the heat of the moment", when posts are churned out every few seconds, so I appreciate your work.Doctor Shemp wrote:Yet progressivism as an ideology advocates change and abandonment of the present and the past, whether gradual or sudden. Change will always hurt some people. The ideology rests on the assumption that the betterment of the many is worth the hurt to the few, and on the belief that the status quo should never be immune to challenge. How is a position that no-one should ever be offended under any circumstances in any way consistent with a progressivist position? I can understand the argument that you shouldn't offend someone with their hurt as your sole intention, but I cannot reconcile progressivism with the belief that incidental offense should be avoided even if it means compromising or abandoning a reasoned argument, entire discussion, or scientific fact, nor can I understand how anyone can.
Anyways, now for the very long overdue cynic comment:
The difference is that tumblr left-wingers are completely right in their opinions and views. Of course. 100%. No discussion needed. That's why, if you "trigger" them, it automatically means you're wrong!Doctor Shemp wrote:What's the difference between a scientific fact that offends a right-winger with a scientific fact that offends a left-winger, other than the latter would get you shit on Tumblr?
Re: ./twitter-thread
Damn it I missed my oppurtunity... Oh wait I can do this instead!
Do you hate drama? Do you prefer everyone calm and getting along? Then this is for you!
Buy our Antidramanolite pills now which prevent drama!
Only 19.99$ for a ten pack!
Or has drama already come?
Then buy Direct Antidramanolite and all your worries will go away!
Only 29.99$ for a ten pack!
Buy now at your closest drug store
For information about possible adverse effects contact your doctor.
Bryux medicines not responsible for any side effects or pills not working
Do you hate drama? Do you prefer everyone calm and getting along? Then this is for you!
Buy our Antidramanolite pills now which prevent drama!
Only 19.99$ for a ten pack!
Or has drama already come?
Then buy Direct Antidramanolite and all your worries will go away!
Only 29.99$ for a ten pack!
Buy now at your closest drug store
For information about possible adverse effects contact your doctor.
Bryux medicines not responsible for any side effects or pills not working
woawoawoah someone spoilered the obligatory signaturtle
Re: ./twitter-thread
Yet you're 100% convinced that your opinion on political issues like the one that was the topic of yesterday's drama is always completely correct, and go so far as to belittle and make fun of anyone who expresses an opinion that differs from yours.Horikawa Otane wrote:Anyway... As for your other points on the merits, etc. of progressivism as an ideal. It's extremely interesting and made for an enlightening read. However, I am not properly qualified to really have that debate. My knowledge on the progressive vs non-progressive ideological dispute is purely historically based. Normally the progressive ideal is the right one to follow historically, even if it ruffles feathers or starts wars, but obviously at times that too can be taken to extreme (Stalin, Mao... I mean, Mao was great with women's rights, but pretty much everything else sucked). And because I'm so historically minded I can only guess and speculate as to present day politics based on that history. And that's not really useful except in certain circumstances where parallels are obvious. I could certainly discuss other topics such as gender studies, etc. that I am trained in (though not an expert of... Nor would I really want to be. I have some issues with that field's academic rigour at times. Lots of great, amazing work and lots of work that's more concerned with form than argument or fact), but grand-level political concepts such as modern day progressive and non-progressive ideals is something I'm strictly limited in most circumstances to having an opinion on rather than speaking with any real knowledge or authority.Doctor Shemp wrote:Oh, and for what it's worth on an old topic, Operation Lollipop is fairly new, and Tumblr was shit before then.
I'm no conservative. I'm against conservatism and especially reactionism as a principle. By the way, I'm using these terms and later ones in their actual meaning, not whatever American domestic politics has distorted them to mean, since I can't be buggered keeping up with that.
-
- Local Candy Fiend
- Posts: 136
- Joined: 13 years ago
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Location: Scorpions and snakes aplenty oh my.
Re: ./twitter-thread
Pssst, Horikawa, the mods have stated a cease and desist as for as Septentrion drama goes, you might want to drop it.
Oh man it's a Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/BwarchtheGamer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: ./twitter-thread
Thanks. I have some study background in politics. I can't imagine realistically getting a job in its theoretical application though, since that would mean a university position, and the current Australian government's plan is to slash university funding and have them raise costs to make up the shortfall, and universities have the view that the first faculty to be cut in any cost-cutting exercise is the arts faculty (which politics of course falls under). That's documented in practice, too, since there's been many much smaller cuts in the past and they've always hit arts first. I don't know how that compares to the American model; the government says it's trying to replicate the American model, and the opposition is accusing them of trying to replicate the American model, so clearly both sides have very different ideas of what the American model actually entails and its merits or lack of them.Horikawa Otane wrote:Have you thought of going into political science? You seem to have a mind for it. It's also a relatively lucrative field... Assuming you get a job in it in the first place (not too bad provided you go to the right grad schools and do well).
For reference, the current Australian model is that the government will pay for most of your education themselves, with the exact amount depending on the degree, with the rest being financed through a very low-interest government loan that you start to pay back when your income surpasses a given level. The total cost of the degree is capped by law. The current government plans to drastically cut the portion that they pay for themselves, significantly increase the interest rate of the loan, decrease the income threshold at which you have to start repaying it, and remove the cap on the cost of the degree. The biggest universities in the country have said that the changes will mean that they'll have to either double or triple the cost of degrees, depending on the degree, if they want to avoid further cuts to their faculties. It's either that or go bankrupt. Personally I expect them to cut, since even the reduced price signals of a long-term loan will bite low-income families when the loan is that big. That's assuming of course that the changes pass the Senate, which is anyone's guess, considering that the balance of power is now hold by a popularist party that got in largely on a protest vote from the "a pox on both your houses" section of the electorate (a byproduct of compulsory voting).
Basically what I'm saying here is that I don't see a future, or at least a future that isn't incredibly competitive, in arts academia in Australia, and moving internationally would be even more competitive, but I'm flattered that you'd think I have the potential for it, even if that was largely a reproduction of an undergraduate argument. I suppose though that an undergraduate argument in an unfamiliar field is impressive. I'm lost whenever my friend who did philosophy starts talking about that, for example.
- Sorel
- In the shadows
- Posts: 702
- Joined: 10 years ago
- First name: Alexander
- Pronouns: he/him/his
- Location: some place
Re: ./twitter-thread
Raining all week
Just like in my heart
Just like in my heart
Former active member, yearly lurker now.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: ./twitter-thread
Il pleure dans mon coeurFluffi-dono wrote:Raining all week
Just like in my heart
Comme il pleut sur la ville ;
Quelle est cette langueur
Qui pénètre mon coeur ?
And I don't remember the rest. Not bad considering I was required to learn it for French class 9 years ago though.
Re: ./twitter-thread
Rain is good. It keeps the plants watered so that I can afford to skip doing that myself.
- Sorel
- In the shadows
- Posts: 702
- Joined: 10 years ago
- First name: Alexander
- Pronouns: he/him/his
- Location: some place
Re: ./twitter-thread
There are no plants in my heartBean wrote:Rain is good. It keeps the plants watered so that I can afford to skip doing that myself.
Only thorns
(Philosophy ahoy)
Former active member, yearly lurker now.
Re: ./twitter-thread
Don't þorns grow on plantsFluffi-dono wrote:There are no plants in my heartBean wrote:Rain is good. It keeps the plants watered so that I can afford to skip doing that myself.
Only thorns
(Philosophy ahoy)
,