From what I've seen (and I haven't watched all the matches, but I have watched most), there are pokémon that were difficult for certain teams to deal with but nothing that would have been truly insurmountable. Sometimes it came down to picking the right team, in that sense, and having a three-round match means that if something wrecks you first round, you may have a better idea how to deal with it for the future. As an example, there are some pokémon that were fast and hit hard but were rather frail. In theory, you'd want a priority move or something faster to revenge kill them, but that wasn't something every team had access to (or something the player saved for the occasion). And that's just how a format like this works. Or maybe it would be a pokémon the the belly drum Slurpuff that could wreck certain teams once any potential counters are gone (or if there aren't any on that team). On the reverse side, some of the more defensive pokémon could wall entire teams after a certain point, so if you knew that was possible you'd need to save the right pokémon for it. That is on the player's end - something they have to account for, like they would in any competitive match.
My biggest issue seemed to be that sometimes my teams just wouldn't work together. One round I got two pokémon with rain dance with no water moves to be boosted, no abilities to take advantage of the rain and only one pokémon who really could use fire being weakened. On another team I got two pokémon with the exact same coverage and similar enough sets/team roles that left that team with a gaping hole in both offense and defense (and that was a round where all three of the opposing teams could have taken advantage of the defensive gap).
But none of those deal with any specific pokémon and they all are just part of this format - I find myself being unable to complain too much, since I wasn't required to choose either team. I think I found myself getting more offensive pokémon than defensive, but I saw a lot of defensive pokémon and I had my share of them too.
I guess the only thing I would say really didn't work are pokémon that are meant to work on specific teams. I know for some pokémon, that's just about the only option. The team I had with the two rain dancers sticks out in my mind because one of them was to be support on a rain dance team and the other would have been a rain dance lead and they'd be fine on a team built around that. But in a tourney like this, you're either lucky and they help you out or they just become another meat shield.
I'm having similar troubles in making my custom team for the stipulation league - it is technically done, but I don't like it. It has problems. And I am terrified that I'll wind up in the first few fights with pokémon that can't form a cohesive 3 or 4 pokémon team. I had to move away from certain strategies I might have favored or certain pokémon I might have liked to try and reach something more balanced that can function with just a few members.
Maybe for the next one, just take out certain pokémon that just aren't viable in the slightest or only fit on certain teams and perhaps, instead, make a second set for certain pokémon that can support it. I know much earlier someone was complaining about a Chesnaught not having a secondary STAB attack because it was running a more focused defensive set. If you really want to balance out the numbers of available pokémon, maybe take ones like that and give them two very different sets.
I mean, then the question would be how do you pick which ones get different sets and what sets to use, so maybe this is terrible advice. But, in either case, that is my thoughts on the sets.
My biggest issue seemed to be that sometimes my teams just wouldn't work together. One round I got two pokémon with rain dance with no water moves to be boosted, no abilities to take advantage of the rain and only one pokémon who really could use fire being weakened. On another team I got two pokémon with the exact same coverage and similar enough sets/team roles that left that team with a gaping hole in both offense and defense (and that was a round where all three of the opposing teams could have taken advantage of the defensive gap).
But none of those deal with any specific pokémon and they all are just part of this format - I find myself being unable to complain too much, since I wasn't required to choose either team. I think I found myself getting more offensive pokémon than defensive, but I saw a lot of defensive pokémon and I had my share of them too.
I guess the only thing I would say really didn't work are pokémon that are meant to work on specific teams. I know for some pokémon, that's just about the only option. The team I had with the two rain dancers sticks out in my mind because one of them was to be support on a rain dance team and the other would have been a rain dance lead and they'd be fine on a team built around that. But in a tourney like this, you're either lucky and they help you out or they just become another meat shield.
I'm having similar troubles in making my custom team for the stipulation league - it is technically done, but I don't like it. It has problems. And I am terrified that I'll wind up in the first few fights with pokémon that can't form a cohesive 3 or 4 pokémon team. I had to move away from certain strategies I might have favored or certain pokémon I might have liked to try and reach something more balanced that can function with just a few members.
Maybe for the next one, just take out certain pokémon that just aren't viable in the slightest or only fit on certain teams and perhaps, instead, make a second set for certain pokémon that can support it. I know much earlier someone was complaining about a Chesnaught not having a secondary STAB attack because it was running a more focused defensive set. If you really want to balance out the numbers of available pokémon, maybe take ones like that and give them two very different sets.
I mean, then the question would be how do you pick which ones get different sets and what sets to use, so maybe this is terrible advice. But, in either case, that is my thoughts on the sets.