raocow's talkhaus

Cheers, Validon. Yours is class too.

Aposke told me beards were happening.

Well, bugger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4APyw5f-mog

Any reasons for your FoSes, Para? If we're outing them, Redsy and Tsurugi are up there for me for not really saying much and tending to just BW. Probably Jesuis in that list as well. Para's also up there for his quickturn regarding Aposke from d1 to d2 and generally throwing out FoSes for little or ...

Oh marvellous. Well, looks like our coppers will be dying in the next couple of days. Hopefully we should have enough info by then.

Aposke may or may not be insane, but two people have expressed doubt over him being maf due to circumstance. I can get behind that. The chances of Aposke being maf are negligible, I reckon. One, fakeclaiming copper d1 would have been a very bold move in this setup and two, he claimed hooked rather ...

Paralars wrote:Cop should definitely have a look on falky

What, for trying to ensure that the town isn't relying on false assumptions? Fair enough.

Aposke, that doesn't prove anything. For this, let's assume you're sane. 1. You got a guilty on BTYM 2. BTYM showed up as villager when he got killed 3. If he was miller and you're sane, you would have got a guilty on him. Add it all together and the possibilities are that he was miller and you're s...

Aposke wrote:This means BTYM was definitely not miller, rendering me insane because I got a guilty on him even though he was a regular blue.

How does that in any way prove that BTYM wasn't miller and that you're insane?

Don Zanevsky wrote:You are not allowed to PM other players during the day.

I'm assuming that also means at night apart from the mafia. Apart from that, yeah, keeping AUS alive isn't going to do anything as the maf aren't going to hit him, so why not.

Lynch AUS

Jesus, AUS. First you push for a lynch looking scummy as hell, now you claim orc on Aposke who a) most people seem to be satisfied that he's a cop of some description and b) will most likely be hooked anyway. I suppose it would give the other cop the advantage of knowing their sanity, but my god.

Yeah, on EM. Apparently not on here though, BTYM.

Aposke wrote:Not to mention we'd know my sanity for sure after we've testkilled one of his guilties

Unless it happened to be another guilty on somebody who appears blue. Not terribly likely, but it would be very unfortunate. Besides, there's still the hooker to worry about.

I agree, Val. Just pointing it out. If the unknown copper dies tomorrow, it's a safe bet that the maf would carry on hooking Aposke and we'd be reduced to purely scumhunting. Not optimal. Numbers say that the other cop dying isn't too likely, but it's a possibility. We just have to hope that doesn't...

I'm more suspicious of the guys that haven't really said anything right now, that includes Redsy and Falky. Timezones. Hopefully the new rule will minimise that issue somewhat. Falky and Bartle might be bad guys, since they both voted for BTYM without hesitation and didn't really contribute any inf...

if two or more other people claim to be a cop, the mafia will probably get rid of the actual cop and we'll know the other one is a liar. Of course, that's assuming the maf would sac for the cop and incriminate themselves. Which they may deem worth it to get rid of at least one copper. I say we test...

In EM, Mafia can't Janitor the BG if he rescues someone elses life. Technically, they can. Say A is the maf target and B is the BG. Maf decides to jan B for whatever reason and B dies protecting A. B would be janned. Of course, that would be rather stupid and people tend to just jan their kill targ...

Interesting start. I wonder if limepie was the maf target or if he was pro BG.

oh no tsurugi's been cthulud shrink on tsurugi

Signing up.

I'll just stick with Tetley, nowt posh.

Like the 12-person random games in Sandbox. Basically, I'd let everyone know possible roles, but nobody would know what the roles in the game actually were unless there was a tailor or something. I dunno, I don't think it's introducing more gimmicks that's the problem. It may help in a way as people...

dashta wrote:we barely had enough for a good two party game

I disagree. 14 is plenty. It would probably work better with maybe two third party roles though.

EDIT: Would there be any interest in a possible closed-roles setup?

Yet again, it's difficult to say what the situation is. It may have been a forged will, it may have been legit. However, with watcher and cop both dead, NLing would get us nowhere. Might as well follow the will on the chance that it was real. Vote tatanga.